And so it begins…
Iowa has spoken- loudly perhaps, perhaps not. We shall see…
The other primaries and caucuses are approaching. Hillary and Bernie were neck-and-neck in
Iowa, and Bernie is leading in New Hampshire.
The Canadian won the GOP nod, but The Trumpeter is still amongst the
leaders of the gaggle of sheep running to represent the Grand Old Party.
A Democratic Socialist establishing a juggernaut, and
getting the attention of the country?
Who’da thunk?
However, the road ahead is treacherous, lest we turn over
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to the Draconians.
Eight years ago, senators were persona non grata amongst the
Republican aspirants- Senator Obama wasn’t qualified, we needed somebody with
executive experience in order to hit the ground running from Day 1- ultimately,
of course, in the form of Mitt Romney.
The governors and “executives” are being shunned this time
around, in favor of “new ideas”, and “fresh leadership”, the maverick Trump, Senators
Cruz and Rubio.
Jeb Bush has been shortchanged horribly by his handlers, and
the heir apparent has run a horrendous campaign- to the point where one has to
question for whom he was running- himself or the family?
Chris Christie, particularly post-bridgegate (Thank you,
Rachel!) has mostly been an assterisk.
And Ben Carson and Carly Fiorina have had some brief blips
on the radar, but nothing of consequence.
I have been “watching” Bernie for years, weekly, on the Thom
Hartmann radio show, and I love him to death- and he, too, has tapped into the
search for fresh leadership and new ideas, and has been coming on strong.
His quest for single-payer healthcare, and his indignation
over not even having that on the table during the formulation of the ACA, are legendary. Yes, it is an uphill battle, with no less
than Nancy Pelosi announcing this week that the whole idea is a non-starter.
Not so fast. If the
“Medicaid For All” plan gains no cumulative traction, maybe with some
persuasion, and perhaps some inducements, might not a President Sanders divide
and conquer, and get individual states to take the plunge?
Maybe.
He wants to break up the banks, and is likewise being
ridiculed for likely not having the necessary clout in the Congress with which
he will be confronted.
Again, not so fast.
Even
though Reagan stopped enforcing it, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act is still in
effect. That’s right. Remember the Baby Bells after they broke up
A.T.&T.? So, what’s a non-starter
here is that he does not even need
Congress- just a resolute Justice Department.
Could he pull it off, and find a permanenet solution, outlasting
his presidency? Perhaps. Me thinks that the subsequent solution during
the break-ups, can be found in the construction of the Charters of the new
banks. Clause or clauses within, that
would limit their scope and/or size in perpetuity?
As I said, Sanders is running on the “change” platform, Hillary
as the battle-hardened, progressive pragmatist, that will continue parts of the
last 8 years, and tweak and/or go beyond when necessary- and suddenly a fan of
continuing the fight for “universal healthcare”.
So, Bernie or Hillary?
New Hampshire feels the problem acutely right now, because it
can be, and often has been, pivotal in making or breaking campaigns. It is early, second place, and it is a
primary, not a caucus, state. They
can
change the course, or set it in place more firmly.
You may be asking, “What exactly is the problem?”, and
perhaps commenting: “Just vote your conscience!”
And maybe lose the White House…
The problem is that Hillary can beat every one of the long
list of GOP wannabes- Bernie probably cannot.
Once alone at the top, Hillary will capture the female vote,
and her lagging support amongst young people will increase and solidify- many
people see what’s real about her and what’s not, and recognize the character
assassination that has dogged the Clintons for years. Many people will want to be a part of
electing the first woman POTUS, as they did 8 years ago with the first
African-American. I believe it will
become a juggernaut, and unless there are serious missteps along the way,
cannot be stopped.
And we don't
hate Hillary, stop giving us that bullshit. Many of us just think she is not as good for
the country as Bernie would be. She is like Dianne Feinstein, has forgotten
whence she came, her roots, but we will work hard for her if she is the
nominee. It is clear though,
that right now, she is in panic mode to some extent.
Bernie can beat Trump easily, but it becomes murky after
that- Cruz and Rubio will go toe-to-toe with him, and he’s vulnerable among too
many shallow voters to their methods- the socialism; the subtle, but clever
attacks on his age; his dreaming the “impossible” dream.
The important thing is that one does not destroy the other
during this process, creating cannon fodder for the GOP. It may become critical at some point that the
voters recognize the inevitable, when it becomes so, set their consciences
aside, and vote for the country and not themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment